THE WHOLE FRAGMENT


Cinematic Cartography : Cartographic Cinema
January 30, 2009, 3:07 PM
Filed under: Duration, Interface | Tags: , ,

I spoke recently with Montreal-based cartographer Sébastien Caquard whose work focuses on the intersection between cinema and cartography.  I’ve been interested in the meeting between films and maps as well in the context of thinking about how cinema might deal with ‘data’.

“The encounter between two disciplines doesn’t take place when one begins to reflect on another, but when one discipline realizes that it has to resolve for itself and by its own means, a problem similar to that confronted by the other [for example, the “problem” of narrative, or the “problem” of how to represent reality].” – Gilles Deleuze

Filmmakers and cartographers deal with a similar question: How can we represent information in a meaningful and engaging way? While filmmakers and mapmakers have traditionally created distinctly different visual products, films and maps have long been caught in an intriguing crossover. It is possible to find cinematic elements and strategies in maps,  as well as cartographic elements and strategies in cinema.  See the books Cartographic Cinema, The Atlas of Emotion, and The Sovereign Map.

For example, films set in particular cities might be read as guided ‘maps’ of those cities at different moments in history, and from various points of view. The film spring wind will bring life again can be seen as a kind of ‘map’ of contemporary Beijing. The first part of the film focuses on the world at large and the economic and political relationship between the U.S. and China, the second reveals the city itself – focusing on everyday categories like traffic, crowds, restaurants, grocery stores, bars, tv, etc.. The final section tells the story of a woman who, like hundreds of thousands of others, was displaced from the center of the city (to a new suburb) when her home was torn down in the effort by the government to modernize Beijing and present it for the 2008 Olympics. In essence, the film proceeds as a zoom from the global, to the city, to the individual.

Both maps and films are increasingly made and presented digitally, creating new possibilities for overlap between the two, yet there has been little explicit exploration of how the two forms may begin to merge more significantly. For instance, digital technology has the potential to help maps become more cinematic through multimedia (sound, video, photo, etc.), narrative, and emotion.  Some hybrid map/multimedia forms are being explored – documented in the excellent book Else/Where Mapping – but, for the most part, these practices remain on the fringes of cartography.

Sébastien and I are planning to write a paper together for a special issue on Art and Cartography of the Cartographic Journal, investigating, in part, whether there are digital products that can be read as both  ‘maps’ and ‘films’, and what these might look like.

Question:

Could these film-map hybrids better or newly represent global/corporate/collaborative/data-filled life today?

“In his book The Image of the City, writer Kevin Lynch shows how the ability to map, from memory, the spaces in which we live corresponds directly to our feelings of either belonging or alienation, and by extension, our sense of political engagement and empowerment. But the ability to map our world has grown increasingly complex with the rise of tremendously powerful transnational corporations, unbridled competition and the unrestrained pursuit of self-interest. How do you ‘map’ a global economy, a vast military industrial complex, or the convergence of gigantic corporations? How do you chart multinational banking and stock exchanges, or the increasingly powerful web of bureaucratic control?” (New Digital Cinema, p. 74-75).



Documentary + Social Change (Organizations)
January 24, 2009, 7:27 PM
Filed under: Distribution, Documentary, Production Models | Tags:

There is a quiet but fascinating synergy emerging between documentary filmmakers and social change organizations. Groups like Media Rights have emerged with the purpose of tying documentaries together with organizations or educational endeavors that are roused & galvanized by the same issues as the films talk about.

The idea is that educators and social change organizations gain new ways – beyond dull texts, e-mail calls to action – to show people how the system of mass food production works or why vinyl house siding is scary. On the other hand, documentary filmmakers get a new way of distributing their films – reaching, through educators and organizations, the audiences that want to see their work and for whom their work might make a difference.

We were encouraged by Working Films (‘linking non-fiction film with cutting edge activism’) via a kind & free phone consultation to pursue an unconventional distribution strategy by striking up relationships with organizations that work on the issues that our film touches – skipping the traditional film distributor world altogether. It’s a good idea. There’s also no road map for this:

  • What do these partnerships between filmmakers and organizations look like? How do they get formed?
  • Is this the death of film distributors? (e.g. cutting out the middle man between films and audiences)
  • Or, will distributors adapt to this new sphere, perhaps creating relationships with social change organizations and targeted online spaces rather than festivals and TV stations?
  • Are non-profit groups like Media Rights and Working Films the new ‘distributors’?